Indian and global savers have a default reflex — fixed deposits feel safe, equity feels scary. But over 10+ year horizons, equity SIPs have outperformed FDs by 4–6% per year — even after tax and bear markets. This calculator runs both side-by-side, with realistic tax assumptions, so you can see the actual gap.
Calculator → Comparison
FD / RDvsEquity SIP
The classic ‘safe vs growth’ debate — equity SIP and FD/RD compared with tax impact.
FD / RD Option A
Bank fixed/recurring deposit. Guaranteed return, taxed at slab rate.
FD / Recurring Deposit
Equity SIP Option B
Monthly investment in equity mutual fund. Higher long-term return, volatile, LTCG-taxed.
Equity SIP
The Verdict
–
Adjust the inputs above to see how the answer changes.
Get a personalised comparison report
Drop your email and we’ll send a custom PDF summary tailored to your inputs above — plus weekly tips on investing, taxes, and business finance.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.Ready to turn knowledge into wealth?
Master investing, business finance & accounting with our structured, expert-led courses.
Why FD Feels Safer (And Sometimes Is)
- Capital protection — your principal is contractually safe (within deposit insurance limits).
- Predictable maturity — you know to the rupee/dollar what you’ll get.
- No volatility — psychologically easier, especially for short-term goals.
- Liquidity — easy to break a fixed deposit; harder to sell equity in a down market without locking in losses.
Why SIP Beats FD Over Long Horizons
- Higher gross return — equity has historically returned 10–13% vs FD’s 5–8%.
- Better tax treatment — equity LTCG (12.5% in India after ₹1.25L exemption) is much lower than FD interest taxed at slab (often 30%).
- Compounding compounds — a 5% return-rate gap over 20 years means 2.5–3× the maturity, not 2×.
- Inflation protection — equity tracks corporate earnings, which generally outpace inflation.
Worked Example
When FD Is Actually the Right Choice
- Goal < 3 years away — equity is too volatile for short horizons.
- Emergency fund — 6 months of expenses must be liquid and capital-preserved.
- Retirement income (post-65) — gradually shift to FDs/bonds for predictable cash flow.
- You have zero risk tolerance — and recognise the cost is significant lower returns.
The Hybrid Approach (Recommended for Most)
70% equity SIP / 30% FD or debt MF for long-term savers in their 30s–50s. Captures most of equity’s upside while limiting drawdowns. Rebalance annually back to target allocation. Shift toward FD-heavier mix gradually after 50.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FD interest fully taxable?▾
What about ELSS for tax saving?▾
Aren’t FDs guaranteed safer in a recession?▾
What return rate should I assume for SIPs?▾
How does this work in different countries?▾
Ready to turn knowledge into wealth?
Master investing, business finance & accounting with our structured, expert-led courses.
